Texas Decides 2018 Voters Guide
Start Over

Voters Guide

District Judge #171

The Texas District Courts form part of the Texas judicial system and are the trial courts of general jurisdiction of Texas. Each district court has a single judge, elected by partisan election to a four-year term.

Click a candidate icon to find more information about the candidate. To compare two candidates, click the "compare" button. To start over, click a candidate icon.

  • Candidate picture

    Bonnie Rangel
    (Dem)

Social Media

Biographical Information

How will you ensure impartiality in your court given the current system of financing judicial campaigns which allows donations from those who may later bring cases before the court?

How have you worked toward improving access to justice and what role should the court play in ensuring access to justice?

What actions will you take whenever an attorney's zealous advocacy crosses over to advocacy which impugns the integrity and motivations of you as sitting judge in the case?

What do you believe would justify your recusal in a case?

Education/Degrees New Mexico State University - Bachelor of Arts in English University of Notre Dame - Juris Doctorate
Professional Experience Private Attorney for 20 years 171st District Court Judge for 18 years 243rd Drug Court Judge for 7 years Family Law Court for 2 years
Community Involvement Advisory Committee Member for EPCC Legal Assistant Department Advisory Committee Member for EPCC Court Reporting Department Advisory Board Member for YISD Business Professionals of America YWCA Board Member Houchen Center Board Member El Paso Juvenile Board Member Speaker at Lulac Conferences & Domestic Violence Conference Board Member National Conference of Christians & Jews
When I took the Oath of Office for the 171st Judicial Court 18 years ago, I took an oath to follow of laws of the State of Texas and the Constitution of the United States. Therefore, in each and every case, I focus on following the law, providing an equal playing field for all the litigants, respecting all that appear before me, and being fair and impartial.
As a council, all the judges have worked towards revamping the Indigency policy and procedures implemented in our courts, including the appointment of attorneys. It is the court's role to insure that a competent attorney is appointed to the indigent defendant as soon as possible to minimize incarceration as well as insure a zealous competent defense.
I will speak to the attorney privately, in chambers, regarding his/her allegations followed by a voluntary recusal from the case. It is my opinion that no judge should preside over a case where an attorney has questioned the integrity of a judge.
The above question involving the impugning of the judge's integrity mandates recusal, as well as being related by blood or marriage, either to the attorneys, their respective clients, or any witness in the case. In addition, if I cannot be fair and impartial due to a bias or previous experience, I recuse myself as well.